I conclude, however, the tenant did not receive what it bargained for and is entitled to a reduction by way of damages. This is immensely difficult and may amount, largely, to guesswork Martin v. Haack, 1927 CanLII 57 (SCC), [1927] S.C.R. 413. I would conclude that the damage to the defendant business by the failure of the landlord for heat failure and water problems would amount at least to 25% of the amount owing under the contract.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.