A section similar to this was considered in Stott v. Heninger, 1935 CanLII 23 (SCC), [1935] S.C.R. 408, [1935] 3 D.L.R. 700. The point at issue in that action was whether the fact that a chattel mortgage came into existence before the mortgagor became a tenant would preclude the removal of the restriction. It was held that there was no restriction in any event, whether the mortgage was made before or after the commencement of the tenancy.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.