The cases in which an action has been dismissed for delay on the ground of delay have been relatively extreme. In Piche v. Mitchell [1963]2 O.R. 193-195 (H.C.J., Sr. Master (Marriott), it was held that a plaintiff who had done nothing in an action for five years could not in answer to a motion for dismissal for lack of prosecution claim that the defendant had not been prejudiced by the delay.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.