[1] In our view, the motions judge was correct in dismissing the appellant’s action as prescribed on the basis that the cause of action had accrued more than six years before the Statement of Claim was issued on November 27, 2000. The motions judge relied on the principle set out in Peixeiro v. Haberman, 1997 CanLII 325 (SCC), [1997] 3 S.C.R. 549 where the court stated that, “the exact extent of the loss of the plaintiff need not be known for the cause of action to accrue. Once the plaintiff knows that some damage has occurred and has identified the tortfeasor [citations omitted] the cause of action has accrued.”
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.