In the factum on behalf of the plaintiff for this appeal, counsel refers to Langenecker v. Sauvé, and the principles that an action should not be dismissed for delay unless either (1) the delay was intentional or contumelious; or (2) the delay was inordinate, inexcusable and prevents the fair trial of the action, i.e. prejudiced the defendant. Counsel then lists in his factum the failures on the part of the Master to which I will refer below.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.