What factors will the Court consider when determining whether an individual is a Convention refugee from Sri Lanka?

Canada (Federal), Canada

The following excerpt is from Canada (Attorney-General) v. Ward, 1990 CanLII 7985 (FCA), [1990] 2 FC 667:

Two recent cases in this court have dealt with the appropriate factors to be taken into account. In Rajudeen v. M.E.I. (1984), 55 N.R. 129, the court held that although the evidence established that the mistreatment of the applicant had been carried out by thugs of the Sri Lanka majority and not by government authorities or by the police, the police took no active steps to stop the mistreatment. The applicant had therefore established ample justification for being unwilling to avail himself of the protection of Sri Lanka so that the had satisfied the definition of Convention refugee. In a concurring opinion, Stone J.A. had this to say in Rajudeen v. M.E.I., at p. 135: Obviously, an individual cannot be considered a "Convention refugee" only because he has suffered in his homeland from the outrageous behaviour of his fellow citizens. To my mind, in order to satisfy the definition the persecution complained of must have been committed or been condoned by the state itself and consist either of conduct directed by the state toward the individual or in it knowlingly tolerating the behaviour of private citizens, or refusing or being unable to protect the individual from such behaviour. The respondent contends that no persecution occurred in this case because the treatment complained of was visited upon the applicant by bands of thugs operating outside the law rather than by the state itself. It pointed to some evidence which it claimed as establishing that the state indeed frowned upon the sort of behaviour that is in question and had provided a means of redress in the courts of Sri Lanka. But I think we must look at what actually occurred. It is true that the acts complained of were not committed by the state or its agents. On the other hand, a consideration of the evidence as a whole convinces me that the police were either unable or, worse still, unwilling to effectively protect the applicant against the attacks made upon him. Accordingly, because of his race and religion, the applicant could not reasonably expect to be protected by an important state agency against unlawful attacks. In my view, he had good reason to be fearful and, objectively, such fear was well-founded.

Other Questions


What factors are considered to determine whether inducement was a factor in determining whether an individual was entrapped in a criminal case? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the test for determining whether a party’s intention is a determining factor in determining whether there is a contract for services? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
What is the difference between whether an individual is a Convention refugee and whether that individual is in need of protection? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
What is the test for determining whether age was a determining factor in determining whether a plaintiff should be retained or discharged? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the test for determining whether a defendant has considered each of the factors that determine whether they have been found liable for damages? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What factors are considered in determining whether to refer a fraudulent conveyance action to the bankruptcy court rather than the district court? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Does the credibility of a refugee claimant have to be considered a factor in determining whether to grant refugee status under s. 52(c)(i) of the Human Rights Code? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
What factors will a court consider when determining whether the use of force by a police officer against an individual in custody was unreasonable? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the test for a District Court to determine whether it has considered all the factors required under Section 3553(a) of the Criminal Code? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
In determining whether a federal court has considered the appropriate factors for sentencing under section 3553(a) of the Criminal Code, does a judge need to perform a "robotic incantations" by the sentencing judge? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.