The standard of review to be applied on this appeal is not in dispute. On questions of law, the standard is that of correctness. On questions of fact, the standard is palpable and overriding error (see Housen v. Nikolaisen, 2002 SCC 33 (CanLII), [2002] 2 S. C. R. 235 (CanLII)). With respect to findings of fact, an appellate court may substitute its own view of the evidence and draw its own inference of fact where the trial judge is shown to have committed a palpable and overriding error or make findings of fact that are clearly wrong, unreasonable or unsupported by the evidence.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.