What is the standard of review for the challenged decisions?

Northwest Territories, Canada


The following excerpt is from Valic v WCB, 2005 NWTSC 105 (CanLII):

In determining the standard of review for the challenged decisions, a pragmatic and functional analysis must be undertaken, having regard to four factors: the presence or absence of a privative clause or statutory right of appeal, the expertise of the tribunal relative to that of the reviewing court, the purpose of the legislation and the nature of the question, whether law, fact or mixed law and fact: Pushpanathan v. Canada, 1998 CanLII 778 (SCC), [1998] 1 S.C.R. 982.

Other Questions


What is the applicable standard of review in a statutory appeal from an administrative tribunal or decision maker? (Northwest Territories, Canada)
What is the standard of review for a motion to set aside the 2004 Notice of discontinuance? (Northwest Territories, Canada)
Is reasonableness the applicable standard of review under s. 81.1(1) of the Health and Social Care Act? (Northwest Territories, Canada)
What is the standard of review under section 778 of the Criminal Code of Canada? (Northwest Territories, Canada)
What is the test for determining the reasonableness of a Director's decision? (Northwest Territories, Canada)
What is the test for judicial review of a government's interpretation of the law? (Northwest Territories, Canada)
Is Frobisher Bay's decision not to seek to restrict its authority within the limits of its authority? (Northwest Territories, Canada)
What is the effect of delaying access to the courts for a theoretical argument? (Northwest Territories, Canada)
What is the impact of the clean-up costs incurred by the accused at the time of sentencing for an environmental offence? (Northwest Territories, Canada)
What is the test for rebutting a statutory presumption? (Northwest Territories, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.