The third reason is that the courts’ fundamental role in our political framework is adjudicative. If parties ask the court to entertain a case in the absence of a live controversy with a view of filling a real or perceived legislative gap, and the court does so, this may be viewed as an intrusion in the role of the legislative branch. Borowski v. Canada (Attorney General), supra, at para 40.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.