The applicant submits that in determining the appropriate standard of review, the court is to take a pragmatic and functional approach which takes into account the following factors: 1. The existence of a privative clause; 2. The relative expertise of the decision-maker in question; 3. The purpose of the act as a whole, and the section under review in particular; and 4. The nature of the problem- whether it is a question of law or fact. Pushpanathan v. Canada, 1998 CanLii 778 (S.C.C.)
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.