In Nabholtz v. Kimberley (City), [2002] B.C.J. No. 261, 2002 BCSC 174, Brooke J. wrote at ¶11: The law is clear that an occupier is not an insurer of the plaintiff's safety. Its duty is to take that care that in all the circumstances of the case is reasonable to see that a person will be reasonably safe in using the premises. The standard of care is reasonableness and not perfection.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.