If a judge finds that a plaintiff has violated a plaintiff’s human rights in a civil case, does this rule apply?

British Columbia, Canada


The following excerpt is from Jensen v. MacGregor, 1992 CanLII 8550 (BC SC):

Moreover, if the case involves an investigation of a serious question of law or questions of general importance or if the facts are to be known before the rights are definitely decided, this rule ought not to be applied (Minnes v. Minnes).

Other Questions


In what circumstances will the Respondent at the Human Rights Tribunal of B.C. claim that the Applicant be denied the right to continue to pursue his human rights claim? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the case law on the re-opening of a plaintiff’s case in a civil case? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for a finding that a judge must not make a finding which would directly contradict a finding previously made by another judge? (British Columbia, Canada)
What are some cases dealing with time limits in human rights cases? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is there any case law in which a trial judge was wrong in finding that a plaintiff was not entitled to be held liable for sexual assault? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for limiting the right to publication of a human rights case? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for determining whether the Human Rights Tribunal of BC has jurisdiction to hear a human rights complaint against the respondent? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the time limit for a human rights complaint to be heard in a civil case? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is there any case law supporting a finding of continuing contravention of human rights legislation? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the meaning of the language of the Canadian Human Rights Code in the context of human rights legislation? (British Columbia, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.