Is there any case law in which a trial judge was wrong in finding that a plaintiff was not entitled to be held liable for sexual assault?
British Columbia, Canada
The following excerpt is from Michel v. Doe, 2009 BCCA 225 (CanLII):
On the evidence, I am unable to say the trial judge was plainly wrong in that conclusion: Housen v. Nikolaisen, 2002 SCC 33, [2002] 2 S.C.R. 235.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Can a summary trial judge make a finding that a matter is not suitable for disposition by way of summary trial during the hearing of the summary trial? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for a finding that a judge must not make a finding which would directly contradict a finding previously made by another judge? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the effect of discretion of the Court of Appeal in dealing with allegations of sexual assault in a sexual assault case? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for a plaintiff to prove that he was sexually assaulted at the time of an assault? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for determining whether a trial judge's findings and conclusions of fact have been shown to be wrong? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for admitting or denying an allegation of sexual assault in a sexual assault case? (British Columbia, Canada)
In what circumstances is a plaintiff entitled to rely on necessity in a sexual assault case? (British Columbia, Canada)
If a judge finds that a plaintiff has violated a plaintiff’s human rights in a civil case, does this rule apply? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a judge interfere with a trial judge's findings of fact? (British Columbia, Canada)
What are the findings of the jury in the trial of the former Queen of the South on 5 counts of sexual assault? (British Columbia, Canada)
