Notwithstanding the appeal that this analysis holds, the law in this province is settled by the decision in Hodgkinson v. Simms, supra, where McEachern C.J.B.C. held, at 136: Thus it appears to me that, while this privilege is usually subdivided for the purpose of explanation into two species, namely, (a) confidential communications with a client, and (b) the contents of the solicitor’s brief, it is really one all-embracing privilege…
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.