The trial judge held the arrest to be invalid, but added, “If I am wrong about the arrest, I would nevertheless find that once the arrest was made, there were no exigent circumstances that required the officers to further search the trailer without first obtaining a search warrant” (para. 32). However, the basis of the warrantless search was not “exigent circumstances” but connection or relatedness, i.e. to trigger the common law authority to search for evidence of the crime to which the arrest related: Cloutier v. Langlois, at p. 186. In my view, the seizure of the 392 pounds of marijuana was Charter compliant as it was discovered during a valid search for evidence incidental to a valid arrest. J. The Subsequent “Inventory” Search of the Cab by Corporal Houston Was Invalid
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.