When a search warrant is used to search for evidence of drug dealing, can a defendant deny giving evidence that incriminating statements were made during the search?

However when the search is unreasonable, then the admission of incriminating statements is governed by the law of search and seizure. If a product is uncovered by the unreasonable search, any admissions concerning ownership or control of the product or concerning the crime by which the product came into possession of defendant must be excluded. Such oral incriminating statements may be suppressed on pretrial motion or during trial (People v. Rodriguez, 11 N.Y.2d 279, 229 N.Y.S.2d 353, 183 N.E.2d 651).