British Columbia, Canada
The following excerpt is from Iskum v. Badali, 2009 BCSC 1669 (CanLII):
In Chapelski v. Bhatt, 2009 BCSC 1260, Hinkson J. held that the reasoning in Folk at para. 17: … does not address a point in time past the point of payment of the required fees. He continued at paragraph 17: The reasoning [in Folk] implies that once the point has been passed "the issue of whether a trial is going to be heard by a jury would be conclusively settled".
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.