Does a party have a presumptive right to trial by jury?

British Columbia, Canada


The following excerpt is from Jackson v. Yusishen, 2013 BCSC 1982 (CanLII):

A party has a presumptive right to trial by jury and should not be deprived of that right absent good reason to do so: Cliff v. Dahl, 2012 BCSC 276.

When it assesses a motion to strike a jury notice, the court should bear in mind that a jury must be assumed to be as capable as a judge acting alone. As McKenzie J. wrote in MacKinnon v. Ebner, [1997] B.C.J. No. 364 (S.C.):

Other Questions


Can a party opt out of a trial by jury if they complete their election by jury? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does a notice requiring trial by jury have a presumptive right to that mode? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the substantive right of a trial judge to discharge the jury and complete the trial himself? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does a successful party have the right to claim special costs when the successful party is in a relationship with an opposing party? (British Columbia, Canada)
What are the respective rights of the parties when an easement holder asserts a right to fence lands owned by a servient property? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for a jury to determine whether a jury can be relied on in a trial? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the effect of the intention or understanding of a party to a transaction where a party intended to transfer a vehicle to another party? (British Columbia, Canada)
In what circumstances will the Respondent at the Human Rights Tribunal of B.C. claim that the Applicant be denied the right to continue to pursue his human rights claim? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for setting a trial date for adding a party to the trial? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the burden of proving that a plaintiff has a right to a trial by jury? (British Columbia, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.