However, not everything that goes into deciding a question of law attracts such a standard. Trial judges are frequently required to make findings of fact that inform the ultimate legal question to be answered. Such findings of fact, or of mixed law and fact, without an extricable legal component, are subject to deference and cannot be disturbed unless the trial judge made a palpable and overriding error (see Housen v. Nikolaisen, 2002 SCC 33, at paras. 25, 26 and 36).
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.