On the third aspect of the test, whether there are compelling circumstances consisting of, at least, arguable grounds of appeal, the parent has not met his/her burden. While it is not my task to examine the proposed grounds of appeal to the same extent a panel would, I am to consider whether “… there is a strong case for error at trial and real grounds justifying appellate interference.” (Bellefontaine v. Schneiderman, 2006 NSCA 96 at para. 3.)
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.