[2] The applicant was totally successful with respect to the interim custody issue. The fact that the order was on an interim temporary basis only (what used to be referred to as a Sugar v. Sugar order[1]) does not detract from the applicant’s entitlement to costs. I ordered that the respondent have slightly more access than was offered by the applicant in his notice of motion but the respondent’s position in her offer certainly did not prevail. She was seeking a true joint custody order where the time spent with each parent would be equal.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.