There is little question that, if unable to collect on the equalization payments, the respondent will have unjustly enriched himself at the applicant’s expense. Thus, the first two requirements for the creation of a constructive trust are met as described in Peter v. Beblow, (1993), 1993 CanLII 126 (SCC), 44 R.F.L. (3d) 329 (S.C.C.). However, the applicant’s argument founders on the additional requirement to demonstrate that there is no juristic reason for the inequitable results.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.