What is the proper standard of review for a decision in a personal injury case?
Canada (Federal), Canada
The following excerpt is from Gonzalez Torres v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2010 FC 234 (CanLII):
The parties are in agreement that the proper standard of review is reasonableness: Dunsmuir v. New Brunswick, 2008 SCC 9. Accordingly, if the decision does not fall within the range of possible, acceptable outcomes which are defensible in respect of the facts and law it must be set aside.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is the standard of decision and scope of review in the context of a personal injury case? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the standard of damages for personal injury damages in personal injury cases? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the standard of review of a decision in a personal injury case? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
What is the standard of review for appeal review of an award of damages for damages awarded in a personal injury case? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
How have courts dealt with personal injury claims in personal injury cases? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
In a personal injury case, how do we review a decision of a federal bankruptcy court? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the standard of review of factual determinations in a personal injury case? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the test for determining the standard of review in a personal injury case? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
Does a client who relies on his attorney for personal injury purposes have an obligation to timely filing in a personal injury case? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the applicable standard of review in the context of a personal injury case? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
