To these rationales I add that giving reasoned reasons is an important self-discipline for a judge. The well-known phrase "sometimes it just won't write" signals that occasionally a judge's instincts about a case do not stand up to reasoned analysis. The process of putting pen to paper - of articulating the "path" to one's conclusion - may disclose a flaw in one's reasoning. As L’Heureux-Dubé J. sensibly observed in Baker v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 1999 CanLII 699 (SCC), [1999] 2 S.C.R. 817 at para. 39: "The process of writing reasons for decision by itself may be a guarantee of a better decision."
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.