Most importantly, the application judge gave no reasons for his decision about the content of the order, and it is not obvious from the record why he made the order, given the existence of the 2018 Order, made on consent. Given the total absence of reasons, his decision is not capable of meaningful appellate review. The lack of any reasons amounts to an error of law in the circumstances of this case and is grounds alone for allowing the appeal (Bruno v. Dacosta, 2020 ONCA 602 at paras. 15, 22 and 24).
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.