In the context of the interests of members in the respondent organization, one has to accept the probability of harm being suffered from exclusion from the governing process. I agree with the applicant that such harm is irreparable in the sense that it cannot be compensated for in damages, and that the balance of convenience favours the applicants. See Pandher v. Ontario Khalsa Darbar [2006] O.J. No. 1933, also 148 A.C.W.S. (3d) 469.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.