Absent a finding of an express trust, the plaintiff claims an interest in the defendant's assets by way of a resulting trust. In support of that claim, the plaintiff relies, among others, on the principles outlined in Brundage v. Campbell.[3] The principle is stated, at paragraph 29, in the following words, "a resulting trust exists where there is an agreement or a common intention expressed or implied to share an asset."
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.