S.Y. relies in particular upon Westergard v. Buttress, 2005 BCSC 622, 18 R.F.L. (6th) 196. In that case, the plaintiff claimed a proprietary interest in the defendant’s pension, which he had accrued during his employment at a Prince George sawmill. The pension credits had been accrued from mandatory contributions made by the defendant: Westergard at para. 13. Citing Peter, Mr. Justice Rogers noted that, even assuming that the plaintiff’s efforts had unjustly enriched the defendant in a general sense, in order to award a proprietary claim, there must be a link between the services rendered and the property claimed: Westergard at paras. 42-47. After citing the conclusion of the Court in Carmichael, Rogers J. found that no such link existed in the circumstances:
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.