None of the other factors under section 65 seem to me to be pertinent. The petitioner submits that: One consideration under s. 65(1)(f) is where the value of an asset is acquired by one spouse towards the end of a relationship, and its value is increased by the greater contributions of that spouse. In those circumstances, reapportionment in favour of the owning spouse is appropriate. Enz v. Enz, [1996] Civ. L.D. 524 (B.C.S.C.), para. 12 In the circumstances of the present case, consequently, the petitioner’s greater contributions to the increase in the value of the interest in P.[…] Ltd. during the last three years of the parties’ marriage, and after their separation, militates in favour of reapportionment in favour of the petitioner. I have already addressed why I think that analysis is flawed.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.