The paradigm continues. Inevitably, the husband’s decision to retire, and the corresponding loss of income, results in a dramatic and diminished capacity to pay spousal support and, correlatively, places the wife in a precarious financial situation, even though the property of the marriage has been divided equally. More often than not there is no reasonable prospect of her entering the workforce post-divorce, and the plea of continued “need” is invoked under the principles of Boston v. Boston, 2001 SCC 43, [2001] 2 S.C.R. 413. There is frequently a perception that any financial hardship which the husband faces, as a result of the retirement, can be remedied by his reentering the workforce.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.