What is the initial onus on a party in a motion to evict a person from their home?
Manitoba, Canada
The following excerpt is from Dr. Marek Los v. Myers Weinberg LLP, 2010 MBQB 260 (CanLII):
In applying the criteria imposed by Queen’s Bench Rule 56.01 as well as considerations suggested in DeBono v. Smith, it would appear the moving party has satisfied the initial onus upon it.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What are the expectations of a defendant as a responding party in a motion to evict a plaintiff from her home? (Manitoba, Canada)
Is a party entitled to party and party costs? (Manitoba, Canada)
Are party and party costs appropriate on Class III on a motion? (Manitoba, Canada)
What is the current state of the law on a motion of motion for personal injury? (Manitoba, Canada)
Can an application to suppress the true identity of parties to contemplated litigation be made without notice to the other parties? (Manitoba, Canada)
What is the test for a motion to remove counsel for the opposing party? (Manitoba, Canada)
If a decision is not in favour of both parties, should both parties consider retaining counsel? (Manitoba, Canada)
What are the principles to apply in the context of a motion by a plaintiff to have his case considered on the merits of the motion? (Manitoba, Canada)
Is there any case law where an umpire considered information of one party without the knowledge of the other party? (Manitoba, Canada)
In what circumstances will a party be bound by a third party's expectation of receiving something in return? (Manitoba, Canada)
