Is a party entitled to party and party costs?
Manitoba, Canada
The following excerpt is from Dunford v. Dunford, 2016 MBQB 196 (CanLII):
The petitioner was the substantially successful party on the motion and is prima facie entitled to party and party costs. (see: Gabb v. Gabb, 2001 MBCA 19)
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Are party and party costs appropriate on Class III on a motion? (Manitoba, Canada)
Is an executor entitled to a third party's costs? (Manitoba, Canada)
Is a party entitled to an accounting from the Financial Reporting Authority (FPA) without a separation of the parties? (Manitoba, Canada)
Can an application to suppress the true identity of parties to contemplated litigation be made without notice to the other parties? (Manitoba, Canada)
In what circumstances will a party be bound by a third party's expectation of receiving something in return? (Manitoba, Canada)
Does the adult child have to pay a third of the cost of post-secondary education costs? (Manitoba, Canada)
Is a father entitled to spousal and/or child support from the time of the parties’ separation? (Manitoba, Canada)
Is there any case law where an umpire considered information of one party without the knowledge of the other party? (Manitoba, Canada)
Is an executor entitled to indemnity for costs and expenses incurred by the executor in the course of the administration of the estate? (Manitoba, Canada)
Is a spouse or common-law partner entitled to the commuted value of a pension and each party’s share? (Manitoba, Canada)
