In this case I would, if necessary, arrive at the same result on a second ground, namely, that the form prescribed by the minister is not in evidence, and we have no information as to what the minister had prescribed as required. Without such proof, the privilege does not arise at all: see Demers v. Cullen, per McGillivray C.J.A. at pp. 77-78 and my own reasons at p. 94. Statements not privileged.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.