In our view, the circumstances here fall fully within the rationale of Basarsky v. Quintan et al; the circumstances are unique, causing no prejudice to the appellant insurer by the unfortunate brevity of the respondent's statement of claim. The insurer was fully informed by the plaintiff before actually issuing a statement of claim about his cause of action. The insurer was fully knowledgable of the respondent's claim and indeed warned him to issue the statement of claim that day to avoid any limitation of action problem.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.