Can a defendant defend using qualified privilege in a defamation action against a plaintiff who made a defamatory statement?

Alberta, Canada


The following excerpt is from Tonizzo v. Moysa, 2007 ABQB 245 (CanLII):

In order to be protected by qualified privilege, the defamatory words need not be true, as long as they were honestly believed by the defendant. Mere carelessness as to the truth of the words does not disentitle a defendant to the defence of qualified privilege: Botiuk at para.187; Hill v. Johnston (2006), 56 Alta. L.R. (4th) 262 at paras. 25-26, 2006 ABQB 212. In other words, justification and qualified privilege are alternative defences: even where a statement is not proved to be true, it may be protected by qualified privilege.

Other Questions


Can a party to an action extend the action by unilateral action, when nothing has been done to materially advance the action for five years or more? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the defence of qualified privilege in a defamation action brought by the Respondent Hrynchuk? (Alberta, Canada)
Can malice defeat the defence of qualified privilege in a defamation action? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the test for defamatory statements in a defamation action? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the test for a plaintiff to join the successful defendants in a personal injury action? (Alberta, Canada)
Can a plaintiff amend his Statement of Claim to add a defendant to his Claim? (Alberta, Canada)
Can a plaintiff amend their statement of claim to add a new cause of action? (Alberta, Canada)
Can a learned trial judge order that a constructive trust action be used in a divorce action? (Alberta, Canada)
In what circumstances will a defendant be required to repay in full to a plaintiff in a personal injury action? (Alberta, Canada)
Does a co-defendant have to pay the costs of an unsuccessful defendant in a motor vehicle accident action? (Alberta, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.