The Master in Mahoney v. Mahoney (1997), B.C.L.R. (3d) 79 (B.C.M.C.) was of the same view. The application was to videotape the examination on grounds that the defence doctor was unfamiliar to both the examinee and his counsel. The Master denied the application, also for several reasons including that there were no compelling reasons to interfere with the ability of the examining doctor to proceed with the examination as he saw fit. The examiner in that case was concerned that the videotaping would cause him to divert from his usual mode of assessment and this was accepted.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.