How have the defence treated undertaking 1 and undertaking 2 in the defence?
Alberta, Canada
The following excerpt is from Merit Contractors Assn. v. Regional Council of Carpenters and Allied Workers, 2001 ABQB 139 (CanLII):
Dealing with undertaking number 1, the defence appears to be taking the approach that they are entitled to require the plaintiffs to review all the articles published by Merit and show the defendants which parts of these various articles exonerate the defendants. This appears to fall far short of the precision called for in Drake v. Overland.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Does the implied undertaking of an implied undertaking apply to the use of a searchable searchable database? (Alberta, Canada)
In what circumstances have the defence been successful against the defence in argument? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the defence of self-defence in a murder case? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the test for a defence of set-off? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the test for a defence of issue estoppel? (Alberta, Canada)
Is there any case law or case law in which a defence counsel has been found to have made out deficiencies in the credibility assessment? (Alberta, Canada)
Can a nurse be terminated for ingesting methadone belonging to a patient after which he continued to treat the patient? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the purpose of an affidavit in defence of a claim? (Alberta, Canada)
How has the court treated a request for additional evidence in the context of the trial? (Alberta, Canada)
Can defence counsel argue that the accused has a right to adduce his new evidence for the first time? (Alberta, Canada)
