In this case, I find that the March letter did not unequivocally provide three months’ notice of termination and, further, that the circumstances created by the company did not allow for the plaintiff to use the alleged notice period for its intended purpose - to “let the employee arrange [their] affairs”: Deputat v. Edmonton School District No. 7, 2008 ABCA 13 at para. 11. I, therefore, find the plaintiff’s entitlement to a notice period commenced on June 12, 2015.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.