In Fenhoulet v. Passavant, supra, the Lord Chancellor in his judgment is reported as follows: “The single question is, whether these charges, referred for scandal and impertinence, may be relevant to the merits; and the majus or minus of the relevancy is not material, which turns on this, whether plaintiff has any ground for this suit or not; for if relevant, it cannot be said they are scandalous or impertinent. Otherwise it would be laying down a rule, that all charges of fraud are scandalous; which would be dangerous, and cannot be the rule; for nothing pertinent to the cause can be said to be scandalous.”
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.