The trial judge in this case considered Cunard v. Marten, supra, and said at p. 437: Walton J. went on to hold that the policy was clearly not a policy on goods but a liability policy and accordingly the suing and labouring clause was not applicable since it was on the face of it only intended to apply to "insurance" on "goods, merchandise and ship". The present policies in my opinion are liability policies as well and not insurance on the "goods, merchandise and ship". On the basis of the foregoing authorities, and, as a matter of construction I am of the opinion that the plaintiffs cannot rely on the "sue and labour" clause to recover expenses incurred by them to avert or minimize liability.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.