A failure to take into account the complete lack of any particulars in a case results in a conclusion based on speculation, rather than allegations of fact (See: Goddard, para. 143). Further, bare allegations are not sufficient to take the case out of the “realm of conjecture.” The facts alleged must be capable of supporting a reasonable inference that the bad treatment was related to the prohibited ground of discrimination (See: Schnurr v. Douglas College, 2007 BCHRT 40, aff’d 2008 BCSC 1799, 2008 BCSC 1799). Particulars of the claim have been set out in the complaint. This is not a case of a complete lack of any particulars, but there are deficiencies. However, for the purposes of this decision, I am satisfied that there are sufficient particulars to allege a continuing contravention. Specifics and the time frames of the allegations must be proven by the complainant at a later time.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.