It is not suggested, nor in my view could it be, that the petitioner did not have an opportunity to dispute the existence of reasonable and probable grounds to support the officer’s belief. Where a driver who has received a 24-hour roadside prohibition does not dispute the prohibition, it is not unreasonable to conclude that the driver admits the infraction for which the prohibition was issued. In Scheffer v. B.C., 2004 BCSC 258, the learned chambers judge said:
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.