What is the test for determining whether there is a prohibited ground of discrimination?
British Columbia, Canada
The following excerpt is from Sweeney v. Law Society of British Columbia, 2020 BCHRT 3 (CanLII):
The Law Society argues that the facts alleged must be capable of supporting a reasonable inference that the adverse treatment alleged is related, in whole or in part, to a prohibited ground of discrimination: Schnurr v. Douglas College, 2007 BCHRT 40 at para. 23 (upheld in Schnurr v. Douglas College, 2008 BCSC 1799).
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is the test for determining whether a plaintiff has been discriminated against on a prohibited ground of discrimination? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for determining whether a prohibited ground of discrimination is the sole factor in the adverse impact of discrimination? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for determining whether a prohibited ground of discrimination is a factor in the adverse impact on a person’s employment prospects? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the legal test for determining whether there has been anordinate delay in determining whether a claim has been successful? (British Columbia, Canada)
What factors are considered in determining whether a ground of discrimination is analogous to s. 15 of the Charter? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for whether a complaint has been filed in time for the purposes of determining whether there was a timely incident of discrimination? (British Columbia, Canada)
In determining whether to grant a Rule 18A trial on part of a trust application, what is the risk that the findings of the application may be carried over to the subsequent determination of other issues? (British Columbia, Canada)
What factors will be considered in determining whether to discriminate against an employee who has been diagnosed with multiple sclerosis? (British Columbia, Canada)
What are the relevant factors for determining whether either of two possible jurisdictions would be suitable for the determination of issues raised by the litigation at issue? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is it reasonable and probable grounds to conclude that a driver who has received a 24-hour roadside prohibition accepts the infraction for which the prohibition was issued? (British Columbia, Canada)
