In the case of McEllistrum v. Etches, 1956 CanLII 103 (SCC), [1956] S.C.R. 787, Kerwin, C.J., stated at page 793 that: It should now be laid down that where the age is not such as to make a discussion of contributory negligence absurd, it is a question for the jury in each case whether the infant exercised the care to be expected from a child of a like age, intelligence and experience.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.