Moreover, according to s. 5 of the Contributory Negligence Act, the question of the degree of fault of each party is also a question of fact. Absent a palpable and overriding error, this court must refrain from varying the apportionment of fault unless there is a strong and exceptional reason for doing so. See Sparks et Fairfax v. Thompson, 1974 CanLII 146 (SCC), [1975] 1 S.C.R. 618; 1 N.R. 387. A simple difference of opinion with the trial judge does not constitute a strong and exceptional reason. An appellate court is only allowed to interfere when the trial judge's finding cannot reasonably be justified on the evidence.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.