The courts have interpreted this to mean that the habitual residence of a child will be the state where both parents lived together with the child, and neither parent can unilaterally change the habitual residence, without the express or implied consent of the other parent: Balev, at para. 19; Cornaz v. Cornaz-Nikyuluw, [2005] W.D.F.L. 4480, [2005] O.J. No. 4121 (S.C.J.), at para. 50.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.