Bearing in mind that support is an entitlement of the child (See Richardson v. Richardson (1987), 1987 CanLII 58 (SCC), 7 R.F.L. (3d) 304 (S.C.C.)) and also that access flows from the right of a child to maintain contact with the non-custodial parent, it is not surprising that the statutory language does not foreclose an order that the custodial parent might pay support to the non-custodial parent (whether it be called spousal support or child support) to enhance that party’s ability to exercise access.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.