The applicant’s submission is based on the indefensible proposition that he had the right to plead guilty in Canada to all charges arising out of his activities of child luring and child pornography, regardless of where the victim resides. He had no such right. Persons, such as the applicant, whose crimes know no borders run the risk that any of the countries harmed by their actions may justifiably demand that they answer for their actions in that country through the extradition process: see France v. Liang, 2007 ONCA 741, 88 O.R. (3d) 12, at para. 24.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.