How have courts interpreted the meaning of the phrase "continues or is in possession"?
Alberta, Canada
The following excerpt is from General Motors Acceptance Corp. of Canada Ltd. v. Owens, 1993 CanLII 7117 (AB QB):
The starting point is what is said to be the "first reported question" that arose about the meaning of the phrase "continues or is in possession", being Mitchell v. Jones (1905), 24 N.Z.L.R. 932.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
In what circumstances will the Court allow the Court to amend the Rules of Civil Procedure to allow the Courts to use the functional approach? (Alberta, Canada)
How have the courts interpreted the meaning of the ABCA? (Alberta, Canada)
How have the courts in the United States and Canada interpreted the principles of the Court of Appeal in the context of a motion for summary judgment? (Alberta, Canada)
How have courts interpreted the phrase “care, custody or control” in the context of an insurance policy? (Alberta, Canada)
How have courts interpreted the meaning of the word “intensely clearness” in the context of legislative intent? (Alberta, Canada)
Can a court order all court-ordered sales of a personal injury property be exempt from all court ordered sales? (Alberta, Canada)
How have the courts interpreted the meaning of the word "contract" in the context of an enforceable contract? (Alberta, Canada)
How have courts interpreted the Charter and the role of the courts? (Alberta, Canada)
How has the Court of Appeal interpreted the meaning of the word unanimous? (Alberta, Canada)
How have the courts interpreted the doctrine of "abandoning possession" in a commercial lease agreement? (Alberta, Canada)
