How have the courts interpreted the meaning of the ABCA?
Alberta, Canada
The following excerpt is from Adams v. Adams, 2011 ABQB 812 (CanLII):
MacPhail v. Karasek, 2006 ABCA 354, 401 A.R. 100 at para. 8 and Brill v. Brill, 2010 ABCA 358, 87 R.F.L. (6th) 254 at para. 8, come to a similar conclusion.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
How have courts interpreted the meaning of the word “intensely clearness” in the context of legislative intent? (Alberta, Canada)
How have the courts interpreted the meaning of a contract where the contract is expressly or implication forbidden by common or statute law? (Alberta, Canada)
How have the courts in the United States and Canada interpreted the principles of the Court of Appeal in the context of a motion for summary judgment? (Alberta, Canada)
In what circumstances will the Court allow the Court to amend the Rules of Civil Procedure to allow the Courts to use the functional approach? (Alberta, Canada)
How have courts interpreted the meaning of the phrase "continues or is in possession"? (Alberta, Canada)
Can a court order all court-ordered sales of a personal injury property be exempt from all court ordered sales? (Alberta, Canada)
How have the courts interpreted the meaning of the word "contract" in the context of an enforceable contract? (Alberta, Canada)
How have courts interpreted the Charter and the role of the courts? (Alberta, Canada)
How has the Court of Appeal interpreted the meaning of the word unanimous? (Alberta, Canada)
How have the provisions of section 92 of the Constitution Act, 1867 been interpreted and interpreted by the courts? (Alberta, Canada)
